linux-kernel - SATA 150 vs SATA 300

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <44EDBD0C.9040501@perkel.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:51:56 -0700
From:	Marc Perkel <marc@...kel.com>
To:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: SATA 150 vs SATA 300

Another speed related question. How much faster are SATA II drives 
compared to regular SATA drives in real life? And - does NCQ really 
help? I'm just looking for a general guess in the form of, "The Disk IO 
upgrading to SATA II with NCQ will generally be X% faster." What value is X?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/