lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:51:56 -0700 From: Marc Perkel <marc@...kel.com> To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: SATA 150 vs SATA 300 Another speed related question. How much faster are SATA II drives compared to regular SATA drives in real life? And - does NCQ really help? I'm just looking for a general guess in the form of, "The Disk IO upgrading to SATA II with NCQ will generally be X% faster." What value is X? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists