[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060824155814.GL19810@stusta.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:58:14 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...e.de>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] BLOCK: Make it possible to disable the block layer
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 04:44:34PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 17:29 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > bool "Enable the block layer" depends on EMBEDDED
>
> Please. no. CONFIG_EMBEDDED was a bad idea in the first place -- its
> sole purpose is to pander to Aunt Tillie.
It's not for Aunt Tillie.
It's for an average system administrator who compiles his own kernel.
CONFIG_BLOCK=n will only be for the "the kernel must become as fast as
possible, and I really know what I'm doing" people.
There's no reason for getting linux-kernel swamped with
"my kernel doesn't boot" messages by people who accidentally disabled
this option.
> dwmw2
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists