linux-kernel - Re: [OLPC-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Compile kernel with -fwhole-program --combine

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200608241915.47451.arnd.bergmann@de.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:15:46 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...ibm.com>
To:	devel@...top.org
Cc:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, linux-tiny@...enic.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OLPC-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Compile kernel with -fwhole-program --combine

On Thursday 24 August 2006 18:48, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> If visibility supports had been in GCC a long time ago, I am sure we would 
> not need EXPORT_SYMBOL today, or rather, would do it by use of 
> __attribute__() rather than a macro that ksymtabs it. Or am I possibly 
> misunderstanding something?
> 
It's probably true, but the way it's done today gave us CONFIG_MODVERSIONS
and EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL, which would break when turning EXPORT_SYMBOL into a
simple __attribute__().

	Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/