linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] Core support for --combine -fwhole-program

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1156440803.3012.170.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
Date:	Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:33:23 +0100
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	Josh Triplett <josht@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Core support for --combine -fwhole-program

On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 10:27 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Would the generation and use of preprocessed source files ($x.c -> $x.i)
> help solve the "standard CFLAGS" problem here, and allow a subsequent
> single compilation of the entire kernel (sans modules) with --combine
> -fwhole-program?

Not for stuff like CFLAGS_raid6altivec1.o := -maltivec -mabi-altivec

Stuff which is _purely_ #defines, such as...
	ncr53c8xx-flags-$(CONFIG_SCSI_ZALON) \
	                := -DCONFIG_NCR53C8XX_PREFETCH -DSCSI_NCR_BIG_ENDIAN \
	                        -DCONFIG_SCSI_NCR53C8XX_NO_WORD_TRANSFERS
	CFLAGS_ncr53c8xx.o      := $(ncr53c8xx-flags-y) $(ncr53c8xx-flags-m)

... can probably be done differently anyway.

It's not entirely unreasonable to treat files with their own CFLAGS just
as we have to treat .S files -- compile them separately, then link.

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/