[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44EDF26B.7070404@citd.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:39:39 +0200
From: Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@...d.de>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...e.de>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] BLOCK: Make it possible to disable the block layer
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>>On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 17:29 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>>
>>>> bool "Enable the block layer" depends on EMBEDDED
>>>
>>>Please. no. CONFIG_EMBEDDED was a bad idea in the first place -- its
>>>sole purpose is to pander to Aunt Tillie.
>>
>>It's not for Aunt Tillie.
>>It's for an average system administrator who compiles his own kernel.
>>
>>CONFIG_BLOCK=n will only be for the "the kernel must become as fast as
>>possible, and I really know what I'm doing" people.
>
>
> Then that should be CONFIG_I_AM_AN_EXPERT (CONFIG_EXPERT), not
> CONFIG_EMBEDDED.
Or to quote the GUI-configuration of xine-ui
CONFIG_EXPERIENCE_LEVEL
With the options:
Beginner
Advanced
Expert
Master of the know universe
SCNR. ;-)
Bis denn
--
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated,
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists