[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1156447974.5629.54.camel@localhost>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:32:54 -0400
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: torvalds@...l.org, akpm@...l.org, aviro@...hat.com,
steved@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: Check lengths more thoroughly in NFS4 readdir XDR
decode
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 19:35 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> So, what you've done is:
>
> -+ if (end - p < xlen)
> ++ if (end - p < xlen + 1)
> goto short_pkt;
> + dprintk("filename = %*s\n", len, (char *)p);
> + p += xlen;
> len = ntohl(*p++); /* bitmap length */
> - p += len;
> - if (p + 1 > end)
> -+ if (end - p < len)
> ++ if (end - p < len + 1)
> goto short_pkt;
> + p += len;
> attrlen = XDR_QUADLEN(ntohl(*p++));
> - p += attrlen; /* attributes */
> - if (p + 2 > end)
> -+ if (end - p < attrlen + 1)
> ++ if (end - p < attrlen + 2)
>
> But is this equivalent:
>
> -+ if (end - p < xlen)
> ++ if (end - p <= xlen)
> goto short_pkt;
> + dprintk("filename = %*s\n", len, (char *)p);
> + p += xlen;
> len = ntohl(*p++); /* bitmap length */
> - p += len;
> - if (p + 1 > end)
> -+ if (end - p < len)
> ++ if (end - p <= len)
> goto short_pkt;
> + p += len;
> attrlen = XDR_QUADLEN(ntohl(*p++));
> - p += attrlen; /* attributes */
> - if (p + 2 > end)
> -+ if (end - p < attrlen + 1)
> ++ if (end - p <= attrlen + 1)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Do you think?
No. I find that mixture of < and <= is much less easy to read. Besides,
the compiler should be able to optimise that for me.
Cheers,
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists