[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060825104738.GA8538@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:47:38 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: "Philip R. Auld" <pauld@...nera.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, riel@...hat.com,
tgraf@...g.ch, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/9] deadlock prevention core
Hi!
> > - We expect that the lots-of-dirty-anon-memory-over-swap-over-network
> > scenario might still cause deadlocks.
> >
> > I assert that this can be solved by putting swap on local disks. Peter
> > asserts that this isn't acceptable due to disk unreliability. I point
> > out that local disk reliability can be increased via MD, all goes quiet.
>
> Putting swap on local disks really messes up the concept of stateless
> servers. I suppose you can do some sort of swap encryption, but
> otherwise you need to scrub the swap partition on boot if you
> re-purpose the hardware. You also then need to do hardware
> configuration to make sure the local disks are all setup the
> same way across all server platforms so the common images can
> boot.
We should really encrypt swap with random key generated at boot, for
all the machine. I believe it is possible (with some non-trivial
setup) today, but it would be nice to do it automagically.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists