[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060825022405.GA3692@thunk.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:24:05 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, akpm@...l.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ext2-devel <Ext2-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC][PATCH] Manage jbd allocations from its own slabs
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 12:11:25PM -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > Why can't you just use alloc_page? I bet the whole slab overhead
> > eats more memory than what's wasted when using alloc_pages. Especially
> > as the typical usecase is a 4k blocks filesystem with 4k pagesize
> > where the overhead of alloc_page is non-existant.
>
> Yes. That was what proposed earlier. But for 1k, 2k allocations we
> end up wasting whole page. Isn't it ? Thats why I created right
> sized slabs and disable slab-debug. I guess, I can do this only for
> 1k, 2k filesystems and directly use alloc_page() for 4k and 8k - but
> that would make code ugly and also it doesn't handle cases for
> bigger base pagesize systems (64k power).
Is there some way we can cleanly have a shortcut case where we use
alloc_page() if fs_blocksize == PAGE_SIZE? The efficiency gains for
what will be the common case on many architectures will probably make
this worthwhile....
- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists