linux-kernel - Re: Re : Re : [HELP] Power management for embedded system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060825132919.GA12370@srcf.ucam.org>
Date:	Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:29:19 +0100
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To:	moreau francis <francis_moreau2000@...oo.fr>
Cc:	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re : Re : [HELP] Power management for embedded system

On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 01:18:43PM +0000, moreau francis wrote:
> Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Triggering suspend/resume is already generic in the form of the 
> > /sys/power/state interface. There's been discussion of producing a 
> > generic battery class lately. There's some trend towards tying suspend 
> > requests into the input layer, but how appropriate that is may depend on 
> > the hardware in question. I think most of the pieces are in place to 
> > provide an interface that isn't tied to looking like APM, and there's
> 
> what about suspend/resume event handling ? Is there something already in
> place ?

You mean passing those events out to userspace? Not that I know of.
-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/