[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060825141625.GI10659@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:16:25 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] BLOCK: Dissociate generic_writepages() from mpage stuff [try #2]
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 10:33:11PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
>
> Dissociate the generic_writepages() function from the mpage stuff, moving its
> declaration to linux/mm.h and actually emitting a full implementation into
> mm/page-writeback.c.
>
> The implementation is a partial duplicate of mpage_writepages() with all BIO
> references removed.
>
> It is used by NFS to do writeback.
This duplication is rather unfortunate, but I don't see a way to distangle
this any better, so ok.
> @@ -693,6 +693,8 @@ out:
> * the call was made get new I/O started against them. If wbc->sync_mode is
> * WB_SYNC_ALL then we were called for data integrity and we must wait for
> * existing IO to complete.
> + *
> + * !!!! If you fix this you should check generic_writepages() also!!!!
This isn't very elegant comment style :) What about a little less shouting..
> int pdflush_operation(void (*fn)(unsigned long), unsigned long arg0);
> +extern int generic_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
> + struct writeback_control *wbc);
> int do_writepages(struct address_space *mapping, struct writeback_control *wbc);
please try to fit the style of the surrounding prototypes, that is no
'extern'
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists