linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 22 of 23] IB/ipath - print warning if LID not acquired within one minute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:35:06 -0700
From:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To:	"Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@...hscale.com>
Cc:	openib-general@...nib.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22 of 23] IB/ipath - print warning if LID not acquired within one minute

1) What makes ipath special so that we want this warning for ipath
devices but not other IB hardware?  If this warning is actually
useful, then I think it would make more sense to start a timer when
any IB device is added, and warn if ports with a physical link don't
become active after the timeout time.  But I'm having a hard time
seeing why we want this message in the kernel log.

2) You do cancel_delayed_work() but not flush_scheduled_work(), so
it's possible for your timeout function to be running after the module
text is gone.

 - R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/