linux-kernel - Re: Unnecessary Relocation Hiding?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200608250938.06240.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:38:06 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc:	"Dong Feng" <middle.fengdong@...il.com>,
	"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Unnecessary Relocation Hiding?

On Friday 25 August 2006 09:20, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Andi Kleen writes:
> 
> > Best is to avoid undefined behaviour in new code.
> 
> Of course.  But do you have a way to implement per_cpu() without it?

I was describing the ideal, not the practical reality.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/