linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] maximum latency tracking infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <44EEAD35.9050005@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:56:37 +0200
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, len.brown@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] maximum latency tracking infrastructure

Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 07:41:35PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> Subject: [RFC] maximum latency tracking infrastructure
>> From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> The patch below adds infrastructure to track "maximum allowable latency" for power
>> saving policies.
> 
> Looks good. But it will also be important to have a user-level way to
> report who is constraining us from power saving and by how much of a
> margin.
> 

there is in the patch:

echo l > /proc/sysreq-trigger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/