linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/17] BLOCK: Move common FS-specific ioctls to linux/fs.h [try #2]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200608251044.44901.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Fri, 25 Aug 2006 10:44:44 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/17] BLOCK: Move common FS-specific ioctls to linux/fs.h [try #2]

On Friday 25 August 2006 10:38, David Howells wrote:
> 
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> 
> >       case FS_IOC_GETFLAGS32:
> >       case FS_IOC_GETFLAGS64:
> 
> That'll get you a "duplicate case statement" warning on a 32-bit arch.
> 

No, I defined them with u32 and u64 arguments, respectively, so the
numbers are distinct on 32 bit.

	Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/