[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060826193126.GF21168@mellanox.co.il>
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:31:27 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...lanox.co.il>
To: Robert Walsh <rjwalsh@...hscale.com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
openib-general@...nib.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22 of 23] IB/ipath - print warning if LID not acquired within one minute
Quoting r. Robert Walsh <rjwalsh@...hscale.com>:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 22 of 23] IB/ipath - print warning if LID not acquired within one minute
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Roland Dreier wrote:
> > 1) What makes ipath special so that we want this warning for ipath
> > devices but not other IB hardware?
>
> There's nothing special about our hardware that requires this. We just
> wanted that in there so we could direct customers to look at dmesg to
> see if the warning popped up if they call with a problem. It is useful
> to have for this purpose.
>
> > If this warning is actually
> > useful, then I think it would make more sense to start a timer when
> > any IB device is added, and warn if ports with a physical link don't
> > become active after the timeout time.
>
> I'd be OK with doing that, too.
Looks like your devices are all single-port. With a multi port
device it is quite common to have one port down.
> > But I'm having a hard time
> > seeing why we want this message in the kernel log.
>
> It's useful when you're trying to track down problems.
How about doing this in userspace by looking at port state in sysfs?
You can diagnose a much wider class of problems this way.
--
MST
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists