linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Redesign cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:05:25 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Cc:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	ego@...ibm.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arjan@...el.linux.com,
	vatsa@...ibm.com, dipankar@...ibm.com, ashok.raj@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Redesign cpu_hotplug locking.


* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org> wrote:

> I personally doubt that it's the case that we'd want to accelerate 
> inclusion - very few things actually do CPU hotplug, and right now the 
> only way to even hit the sequences in normal use is literally just the 
> "suspend under SMP" case that hasn't historically worked very well 
> anyway, but was what made at least me personally aware of the problems 
> ;^).

there's also bootup on SMP that is technically a series of hot-cpu-add 
events. That already tests some aspects of it. Maybe we should turn 
shutdown into the logical reverse: into a series of hot-cpu-remove 
events?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/