| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200608261256.36654.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 12:56:36 +0200 From: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@...oo.it> To: user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, jdike@...aya.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [uml-devel] arch/um/sys-i386/setjmp.S: useless #ifdef _REGPARM's? On Monday 21 August 2006 23:56, Adrian Bunk wrote: > arch/um/sys-i386/setjmp.S contains two #ifdef _REGPARM's. > > Even if regparm was used in i386 uml (which isn't currently done (why?)), > I don't see _REGPARM being defined anywhere. > > Is this a bug waiting for happening when regparm will be used on uml or > do I miss anything? Can anybody explain me how can we use REGPARM if we have to link with host glibc? If we are going to use klibc instead of glibc that's ok (and this is not the case I'm talking about), but I do not know that plan (and nobody discussed the implications). -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists