[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060827182317.GA12642@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:23:17 +0200
From: Andreas Mohr <andi@...x01.fht-esslingen.de>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] Implement per-processor data areas for i386.
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 10:34:46AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Andreas Mohr wrote:
> >This is interesting, since even by doing a non-elegant
> >current->... --> struct task_struct *tsk = current;
> >replacement for excessive uses of current, I was able to gain almost 10kB
> >within a single file already!
> >I guess it's due to having tried that on an older installation with gcc
> >3.2,
> >which probably does less efficient opcode merging of current_thread_info()
> >requests compared to a current gcc version.
> >IOW, .text segment reduction could be quite a bit higher for older gcc:s.
> >
>
> That doesn't sound likely. current_thread_info() is only about 2
> instructions. Are you looking at the .text segment size, or the actual
> file size? The latter can be very misleading in the presence of debug info.
Got me. File size only. And that was 10kB of around 170kB, BTW.
Andreas Mohr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists