linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] Implement per-processor data areas for i386.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:27:17 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
CC:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>,
	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] Implement per-processor data areas for i386.

Andi Kleen wrote:
> On AMD K7/K8 a segment register prefix is a single cycle penalty.
>
> I couldn't find anything in the Intel optimization manuals on it, but I assume
> it's also not dramatic.
>   

All I could find was:

    * avoid multiple prefixes (which was the least important guideline
      in instruction selection)
    * avoid using multiple segment registers (the pentium M only has one
      level of segment register renaming)
    * avoid prefixes which take the instruction length over 7 bytes

None of these apply to the use of %gs to access PDA.

Most of the discussion about prefixes is in avoiding the 0x66 16-bit prefix.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/