[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060827214502.GC3574@stusta.de>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:45:02 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: Trent Piepho <xyzzy@...akeasy.org>
Cc: v4l-dvb-maintainer@...uxtv.org, Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Jack Lo <jlo@...are.com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] Options depending on STANDALONE
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 02:15:26PM -0700, Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Aug 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 01:18:59PM +0200, Oliver Endriss wrote:
> > > Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 04:40:25PM -0700, Trent Piepho wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:56:17PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > > > > You're describing PREVENT_FIRMWARE_BUILD. The text Zach quoted is from
> > > > > > > STANDALONE, which is something else completely. That allows us to not
> > > > > > > build drivers that pull in things from /etc and the like during compile.
> > > > > > > (Whoever thought that was a good idea?)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is DVB_AV7110_FIRMWARE really still required?
> > > > > > ALL other drivers work without such an option.
> > > > >
> > > > > The other DVB drivers that need firmware load it when the device is opened
> > > > > or used (ie. a channel is tuned). At least for the ones I'm familiar
> > > > > with. If they are compiled directly into the kernel, they can still use
> > > > > FW_LOADER since the loading won't happen until utill well after booting is
> > > > > done.
> > > > >
> > > > > For AV7110, it looks like the firmware loading is done when the driver is
> > > > > first initialized. If AV7110 is compiled into the kernel, FW_LOADER can
> > > > > not be used. The filesystem with the firmware won't be mounted yet.
> > > > >
> > > > > So AV7110 has an option to compile a firmware file into the driver.
> > > >
> > > > But is there a technical reason why this has to be done this way?
>
> Is there another way to load firmware in a driver compiled into the kernel?
The CONFIG_DVB_AV7110_FIRMWARE=n code should work fine.
> > > > This is the onle (non-OSS) driver doing it this way, and Zach has a
> > > > point that this is legally questionable.
>
> I know there are other DVB drivers that can have firmware compiled in
> instead of using FW_LOADER. They just don't show that ability in Kconfig,
> you have to edit the driver to enable compiled in firmware.
>
> > > This option _is_ useful because it allows allows a user to build an
> > > av7110 driver without hotplug etc. I NAK any attempt to remove it.
> >
> > If you look at the dependencies of DVB_AV7110 and the code in av7110.c
> > you'll note that your statement "it allows allows a user to build an
> > av7110 driver without hotplug" is not true.
>
> Looks like a mistake in the Kconfig file:
> - select FW_LOADER
> + select FW_LOADER if DVB_AV7110_FIRMWARE=n
Sure, it could be fixed.
But the fact that it didn't work doesn't create a strong reason for
keeping it.
And the whole "kernel without hotplug" is anyway no longer possible in
the usual CONFIG_EMBEDDED=n case.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists