linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH] Fixes for ULi5261 (tulip driver)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:40:26 +0200
From:	Prakash Punnoor <prakash@...noor.de>
To:	Valerie Henson <val_henson@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Pozsar Balazs <pozsy@...linux.hu>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...e.cz>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jgarzik@...ox.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Fixes for ULi5261 (tulip driver)

Am Donnerstag 24 August 2006 19:23 schrieb Valerie Henson:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:59:32PM +0200, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > Am Samstag 19 August 2006 02:16 schrieb Valerie Henson:
> > > Hey folks,
> > >
> > > Added to my to-do list.  Let me know if you figure out anything else.
> >
> > As it comes back to my mind: Last time I tested dhcpcd doesn't work.
> > dhclient does, but takes a lot of time. (The dhcp server is debian
> > based.) Other cards don't have a problem. They get their ip assigned fast
> > and with either dhcpocd or dhclient.
>
> Tcpdump on client and server, please?

Hi, I couldn't try earlier. Since I noticed the server generates a very big 
log in short time, so I think the irrelevant infos should be filtered out - 
it is simply to big to post. As I never used tcpdump, could you give me an 
example how to accomplish this?

Thx,
-- 
(°=                 =°)
//\ Prakash Punnoor /\\
V_/                 \_V

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped