[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200608281642.21737.ak@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:42:21 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
jdike@...toit.com, B.Steinbrink@....de, arjan@...radead.org,
chase.venters@...entec.com, akpm@...l.org,
rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] remove all remaining _syscallX macros
On Monday 28 August 2006 16:05, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The patch below should address both these issues, as long as the libc
> has a working implementation of syscall(2).
I would prefer the _syscall() macros to stay independent of the
actual glibc version. Or what do you do otherwise on a system
with old glibc? Upgrading glibc is normally a major PITA.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists