linux-kernel - Re: e1000 driver contains private copy of GPL... and modified one, too

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <44F30B25.2030906@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:26:29 -0700
From:	Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC:	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, john.ronciak@...el.com,
	jesse.brandeburg@...el.com
Subject: Re: e1000 driver contains private copy of GPL... and modified one,
 too

Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Okay, so modifications are not major: different address of free
> software foundation, completely different formatting, some characters
> added, and some characters removed. It no longer contains Linus'
> clarifications.
> 
> --- LICENSE     2006-07-21 05:42:27.000000000 +0200
> +++ ../../../COPYING    2006-07-21 05:42:27.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1,128 +1,141 @@

[snip]

> 
> Now... I believe nothing evil is going on, but having two slightly
> different copies of GPL in one source seems wrong, can we get rid of
> e1000 one?

I'll ask around here and see if this doesn't make people cringe. Meanwhile 
Pavel should examine sound/oss/COPYING and arch/sparc/lib/COPYING.LIB too :)

Cheers,

Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/