linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] RCU: various merge candidates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1156781748.3034.212.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date:	Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:15:48 +0200
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	dipankar@...ibm.com
Cc:	Paul E McKenney <paulmck@...ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] RCU: various merge candidates

On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 21:38 +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> This patchset consists of various merge candidates that would
> do well to have some testing in -mm. This patchset breaks
> out RCU implementation from its APIs to allow multiple
> implementations, 

Hi,


can you explain why we would want multiple RCU implementations?
Isn't one going to be plenty already?

Greetings,
   Arjan van de Ven
-- 
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/