[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060828120328.ae734de0.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:03:28 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: "Miles Lane" <miles.lane@...il.com>
Cc: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Dan Williams" <dcbw@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, jeremy@...p.org,
Robert Love <rml@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc4-mm[1,2,3] -- Network card not getting assigned an
"eth" device name
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:52:02 -0700
"Miles Lane" <miles.lane@...il.com> wrote:
> On 8/27/06, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
> > Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:19:43 -0700
> >
> > > Jeremy reported that a while back too. I do not know what is causing it
> > > and as far as I know no net developers have yet looked into it.
> >
> > A debugging patch like this one should help figure out the culprit.
> >
> > If we don't see the gibberish netdevice name printed in the kernel
> > logs, then likely something is corrupting the netdevice structure or
> > the memory holding the name.
> >
> > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> > index d4a1ec3..45f9b19 100644
> > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > @@ -738,6 +738,11 @@ int dev_change_name(struct net_device *d
> >
> > if (!dev_valid_name(newname))
> > return -EINVAL;
> > +#if 1
> > + printk("[%s:%d]: Changing netdevice name from [%s] to [%s]\n",
> > + current->comm, current->pid,
> > + dev->name, newname);
> > +#endif
> >
> > if (strchr(newname, '%')) {
> > err = dev_alloc_name(dev, newname);
> >
>
> Dan, do you have any idea why NetworkManager from Ubuntu 6.06.1
> would be corrupting network device names on recent MM kernels?
> I haven't seen this happening with Ubuntu's kernels. If you like, I can
> send you my kernel .config file.
>
> Here's what I get:
>
grepping for `ioctl' gives:
ioctl(9, SIOCGIWNAME, 0xbfe38d8c) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
ioctl(9, SIOCETHTOOL, 0xbfe38d2c) = 0
ioctl(11, SIOCGIFHWADDR, {ifr_name="eth0", ???}) = -1 ENODEV (No such device)
ioctl(11, SIOCGIFFLAGS, {ifr_name="eth0", ???}) = -1 ENODEV (No such device)
Perhaps you could generate the strace output for 2.6.18-rc5, grep that for
ioctl, look for differences? That initial SIOCGIWNAME failure is fishy.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists