[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200608280950.04441.ak@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:50:04 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Bjoern Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Chase Venters <chase.venters@...entec.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] remove all remaining _syscallX macros
On Monday 28 August 2006 09:41, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 28 August 2006 09:35, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I would prefer to keep them on i386/x86-64 at least because
> > a lot of my test programs are using them.
> >
> Hmm, maybe we should have an asm-generic/unistd.h then
> containing something like
Or just keep the current ones that work fine?
(some older glibc implementations also get some cases wrong)
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists