lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:28:58 +0400 From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru> To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>, Andrey Savochkin <saw@...ru>, devel@...nvz.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>, Rohit Seth <rohitseth@...gle.com>, Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@...ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v2) Andi Kleen wrote: >>D) Virtual scan of mm's in the over-limit container >> >>E) Modify existing physical scanner to be able to skip pages which >> belong to not-over-limit containers. > > > The same applies to dentries/inodes too, doesn't it? But their > scan is already virtual so their LRUs could be just split into > a per container list (but then didn't Christoph L. plan to > rewrite that code anyways?) how do you propose to handle shared files in this case? > For memory my guess would be that (E) would be easier than (D) for user/file > memory though less efficient. Kirill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists