[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1156857214.5613.72.camel@aeonflux.holtmann.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:13:34 +0200
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
Hi James,
> From: Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>
>
> Right now, various kernel modules are being migrated over to use
> request_firmware in order to pull in binary firmware blobs from userland
> when the module is loaded. This makes sense.
>
> However, there is right now little mechanism in place to automatically
> determine which binary firmware blobs must be included with a kernel in
> order to satisfy the prerequisites of these drivers. This affects
> vendors, but also regular users to a certain extent too.
>
> The attached patch introduces MODULE_FIRMWARE as a mechanism for
> advertising that a particular firmware file is to be loaded - it will
> then show up via modinfo and could be used e.g. when packaging a kernel.
this patch was debated, but we never came to a final conclusion. I am
all for it. It is simple and can improve the current situation.
> Signed-off-by: Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Regards
Marcel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists