[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44F40E76.5000809@sw.ru>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:52:54 +0400
From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>
To: devel@...nvz.org
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@...ibm.com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrey Savochkin <saw@...ru>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
Rohit Seth <rohitseth@...gle.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH 6/6] BC: kernel memory accounting (marks)
Dave Hansen wrote:
> I'm still a bit concerned about if we actually need the 'struct page'
> pointer. I've gone through all of the users, and I'm not sure that I
> see any that _require_ having a pointer in 'struct page'. I think it
> will take some rework, especially with the pagetables, but it should be
> quite doable.
don't worry:
1. we will introduce a separate patch moving this pointer
into mirroring array
2. this pointer is still required for _user_ pages tracking,
that's why I don't follow your suggestion right now...
> vmalloc:
> Store in vm_struct
> fd_set_bits:
> poll_get:
> mount hashtable:
> Don't need alignment. use the slab?
> pagetables:
> either store in an extra field of 'struct page', or use the
> mm's. mm should always be available when alloc/freeing a
> pagetable page
>
> Did I miss any?
flocks, pipe buffers, task_struct, sighand, signal, vmas,
posix timers, uid_cache, shmem dirs,
Thanks,
Kirill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists