| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:24:41 +0400 From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru> To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> CC: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, Fernando Vazquez <fernando@....ntt.co.jp>, gregkh@...e.de, akpm@...l.org, dev@...nvz.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, stable@...nel.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, xemul@...nvz.org Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] Linux 2.6.17.11 - fix compilation error on IA64 (try #3) Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 03:11:31PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote: > >>>The commit 8833ebaa3f4325820fe3338ccf6fae04f6669254 introduced a change that broke >>>IA64 compilation as shown below: >> >>What happened to the mainline version of the patch to which this >>is a fix (local DoS with corrupted ELFs)? I don't see it in 2.6.18-rc5. >>Did it get fixed some other way, or is it just queued somewhere? Or do >>we have a fix in -stable that isn't in mainline? > > > I thought this was a fix for a prior -stable patch that did not affect > mainline. Or was this thought wrong? both patches should be passed to Linus. Probably it is my fault, since I thought that patches which got into -stable automatically go into Linus tree. Thanks, Kirill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists