lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:15:19 +0800
From:	"Dong Feng" <middle.fengdong@...il.com>
To:	"Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>, "Nick Piggin" <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>,
	"Dong Feng" <middle.fengdong@...il.com>,
	"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@...ba.org>,
	"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>,
	"David Howells" <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: The 3G (or nG) Kernel Memory Space Offset

The Linux kernel permenantly map 3-4G linear memory space to 0-4G
physical memory space. My question is that what is the rationality
behind this counterintuitive mapping. Is this just some personal
choice for the earlier kernel developers?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ