linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060829183208.GA11468@kroah.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:32:08 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	David Lang <dlang@...italinsight.com>
Cc:	Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>,
	Sven Luther <sven.luther@...adoo.fr>,
	debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:46:45AM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> >I think the current way we handle firmware works quite well, especially
> >given the wide range of different devices that it works for (everything
> >from BIOS upgrades to different wireless driver stages).
> 
> the current system works for many people yes, but not everyone.
> 
> I'm still waiting to find a way to get the iw2200 working without having to 
> use modules.

Sounds like a bug you need to pester the iw2200 developers about then.
I don't think it has much to do with the firmware subsystem though :)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/