[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060829201628.GA13807@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:16:28 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 03:13:34PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> > From: Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>
> >
> > Right now, various kernel modules are being migrated over to use
> > request_firmware in order to pull in binary firmware blobs from userland
> > when the module is loaded. This makes sense.
> >
> > However, there is right now little mechanism in place to automatically
> > determine which binary firmware blobs must be included with a kernel in
> > order to satisfy the prerequisites of these drivers. This affects
> > vendors, but also regular users to a certain extent too.
> >
> > The attached patch introduces MODULE_FIRMWARE as a mechanism for
> > advertising that a particular firmware file is to be loaded - it will
> > then show up via modinfo and could be used e.g. when packaging a kernel.
>
> this patch was debated, but we never came to a final conclusion. I am
> all for it. It is simple and can improve the current situation.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Since your tree will depend on this change, you can add it there and
add:
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
from me to the patch.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists