linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/7] Remove the use of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:38:41 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
	Bjoern Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Chase Venters <chase.venters@...entec.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] Remove the use of _syscallX macros in UML

On Wednesday 30 August 2006 07:41, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> syscall() is a horrible botch; it is in fact unimplementable (without 
> enormous switch statements) on a number of architectures.
> 
Ok, good point. I'll leave the _syscallX() macros in for now and only
remove the kernel syscalls in my next submission, so we get at least
the non-controversial part done.

	Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/