[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200608301438.42079.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:38:41 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Bjoern Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Chase Venters <chase.venters@...entec.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] Remove the use of _syscallX macros in UML
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 07:41, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> syscall() is a horrible botch; it is in fact unimplementable (without
> enormous switch statements) on a number of architectures.
>
Ok, good point. I'll leave the _syscallX() macros in for now and only
remove the kernel syscalls in my next submission, so we get at least
the non-controversial part done.
Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists