[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0608301048180.31356@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Lang <dlang@...italinsight.com>
To: Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>
cc: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...eleye.com>,
Sven Luther <sven.luther@...adoo.fr>,
debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Olaf Hering wrote:
>> you are assuming that
>>
>> 1. modules are enabled and ipw2200 is compiled as a module
>
> No, why?
becouse if the ipw isn't compiled as a module then it's initialized (without
firmware) before the initramfs or initrd is run. if it could be initialized
later without being a module then it could be initialized as part of the normal
system
>> 2. initrd or initramfs are in use
>
> initramfs is always in use.
not on my machines.
what does it use for the initramfs?
I don't enable the options in the kernel for initrd, and I don't give it any
source for an initramfs.
David Lang
P.S. there was a suggestion yesterday in this thread that I haven't tested yet.
I plan to test that tonight. if it works then the card can be reinitialized
after the system boots, still no initrd or initramfs needed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists