[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060830214441.GA21353@var.cx>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:44:41 +0200
From: Frank v Waveren <fvw@....cx>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] prevent timespec/timeval to ktime_t overflow
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 10:44:28AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Frank v. Waveren pointed out that on 64bit machines the timespec to
> ktime_t conversion might overflow. This is also true for timeval to
> ktime_t conversions. This breaks a "sleep inf" on 64bit machines.
...
> Check the seconds argument to the conversion and limit it to the maximum
> time which can be represented by ktime_t.
It's a solution, and it more or less fixes things without any changes
to userspace, which is nice. I still prefer my patch in
<20060827083438.GA6931@....cx> though, possibly with modifications so
it doesn't affect all timespec users but only nanosleep (we'd have to
check if the other timespec users aren't converting to ktime_t).
With this patch, we sleep shorter than specified, and don't signal
this in any way. Returning EINVAL for anything except negative tv_sec
or invalid tv_nsec breaks the spec too, but I prefer errors to
silently sleeping too short.
I'll grant this is more of an aesthetic point than something that'll
cause real-world problems (300 years is a long time for any sleep),
but if things break I like them to do so as loudly as possible, as a
general rule.
--
Frank v Waveren Key fingerprint: BDD7 D61E
fvw@....cx 5D39 CF05 4BFC F57A
Public key: hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net/468D62C8 FA00 7D51 468D 62C8
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists