lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 30 Aug 2006 11:43:34 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...ibm.com>
To:	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Cc:	Hoang-Nam Nguyen <HNGUYEN@...ibm.com>, abergman@...ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, openib-general@...nib.org,
	Christoph Raisch <RAISCH@...ibm.com>,
	Marcus Eder <MEDER@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] IB/ehca: includes

On Wednesday 30 August 2006 11:13, Hoang-Nam Nguyen wrote:
> Further comments/suggestions are appreciated!

There are a few places in the driver where you declare
external variables (mostly ehca_module and ehca_debug_level)
from C files instead of a header.  This sometimes leads
to bugs when a type changes and is therefore considered
bad style.

ehca_debug_level is already declared in a header so you
should not need any other declaration.

For ehca_module, the usage pattern is very uncommon.
Declaring the structure in a header helps a bit, but I
don't really see the need for this structure at all.

Each member of the struct seems to be used mostly in a
single file, so I would declare it statically in there.
E.g. in drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_pd.c, you can do

static struct kmem_cache *ehca_pd_cache;

int ehca_init_pd_cache(void)
{
	ehca_pd_cache = kmem_cache_init("ehca_cache_pd",
		sizeof(struct ehca_pd), 0, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN,
		NULL, NULL);

	if (!ehca_pd_cache)
		return -ENOMEM;
	return 0;
}

void ehca_cleanup_pd_cache(void)
{
	if (ehca_pd_cache)
		kmem_cache_destroy(ehca_pd_cache);
}

Moreover, for some of your more heavily used caches, you may
want to look into using constructor/destructor calls to
speed up allocation.

	Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ