[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608301156010.6762@scrub.home>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 11:59:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Andrey Savochkin <saw@...ru>, devel@...nvz.org,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...l.ru>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
CKRM-Tech <ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] introduce atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave()
Hi,
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> --- ./kernel/user.c.dlirq 2006-07-10 12:39:20.000000000 +0400
> +++ ./kernel/user.c 2006-08-28 11:08:56.000000000 +0400
> @@ -108,15 +108,12 @@ void free_uid(struct user_struct *up)
> if (!up)
> return;
>
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> - if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&up->__count, &uidhash_lock)) {
> + if (atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave(&up->__count, &uidhash_lock, flags)) {
> uid_hash_remove(up);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uidhash_lock, flags);
> key_put(up->uid_keyring);
> key_put(up->session_keyring);
> kmem_cache_free(uid_cachep, up);
> - } else {
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
> }
Why does this need protection against interrupts?
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists