[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1GIqPE-00010E-P2@be1.lrz>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:32:24 +0200
From: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@...tempel.de>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Alon Bar-Lev <alon.barlev@...il.com>,
Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
johninsd@....rr.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 August 2006 20:59, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> > This is not entirely true...
>> > All architectures sets saved_command_line variable...
>> > So I can add __init to the saved_command_line and
>> > copy its contents into kmalloced persistence_command_line at
>> > main.c.
>> >
>>
>> My opinion is that you should change saved_command_line (which already
>> implies a copy) to be the kmalloc'd version and call the fixed-sized
>> buffer something else.
>
> It might be safer to rename everything. Then all users could be caught
> and audited. This would ensure saved_command_line is not accessed
> before the kmalloc'ed copy exists.
If you set the new *saved_cmdline=saved_cmdline_init, the users don't need
to be adjusted at all, and you won't have trouble with code that may be
run before or after kmallocking (if it exists).
--
Ich danke GMX dafür, die Verwendung meiner Adressen mittels per SPF
verbreiteten Lügen zu sabotieren.
http://david.woodhou.se/why-not-spf.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists