[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17655.10676.495815.148740@base.ty.sabi.co.UK>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:25:56 +0100
From: pg_lkm@....for.sabi.co.UK (Peter Grandi)
To: Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: A nice CPU resource controller
>>> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:14:13 +0200, Martin Ohlin
>>> <martin.ohlin@...trol.lth.se> said:
martin.ohlin> To those interested I have been working on a CPU
martin.ohlin> resource controller using the nice value as a
martin.ohlin> control signal. At the moment, the control is done
martin.ohlin> on a per-task-level, but I have plans to extend it
martin.ohlin> to groups of tasks. [ ... ]
This reminds me of fair share schedulers, which were popular
some decades ago on mainframes and early UNIX systems.
* G. J. Henry "The fair share scheduler AT&T", Bell
Lab.Tech. J. 1845-1857 63, 8 (Oct.).
* Judy Kay, Piers Lauder "A Fair Share Scheduler CACM", 31:1,
44-55 January 1988. <http://WWW.CS.USyd.edu.AU/~piers/>
* %A J. Larmouth
%T Scheduling for a share of the machine
%J SPE
%V 5
%N 1
%D JAN 1975
%P 29-49
%X <URL:http://WWW.CL.Cam.ac.UK/TechReports/UCAM-CL-TR-2.pdf>
* %A J. Larmouth
%T Scheduling for immediate turnround
%J SPE
%V 8
%D 1978
%P 559-578
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists