[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44F6974C.5090708@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:01:16 +0200
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
CC: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] BLOCK: Make it possible to disable the block layer
[try #2]
Roman Zippel wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
[...]
>> sending users from one menu to another for first manually
>> selecting this or that option is less easy for the user than the usage
>> of select.
>
> How often does he have to do that? Is it really worth it fucking with the
> kconfig system?
Adrian, Roman,
both the comment hack and the 'select' hack introduce redundancy into
the Kconfig files and add maintenance cost. In addition, 'select'
currently brings a danger of inconsistent configuration. As I said
before, the proper solution would be enhancements to the "make
XYZconfig" UIs to comfortably present unfulfilled dependencies, based on
'depends on' alone. Alas my posting here is yet another one without a
patch included...
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-==- =--- =====
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists