[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060901013011.GG4927@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:30:11 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>
To: Josh Triplett <josht@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] rcu: Add sched torture type to rcutorture
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 03:56:58PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Implement torture testing for the "sched" variant of RCU, which uses
> preempt_disable, preempt_enable, and synchronize_sched.
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...edesktop.org>
> ---
> Documentation/RCU/torture.txt | 5 +++--
> kernel/rcutorture.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt b/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt
> index cc4b1ef..25a3c3f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/torture.txt
> @@ -56,8 +56,9 @@ test_no_idle_hz Whether or not to test t
> torture_type The type of RCU to test: "rcu" for the rcu_read_lock() API,
> "rcu_sync" for rcu_read_lock() with synchronous reclamation,
> "rcu_bh" for the rcu_read_lock_bh() API, "rcu_bh_sync" for
> - rcu_read_lock_bh() with synchronous reclamation, and "srcu"
> - for the "srcu_read_lock()" API.
> + rcu_read_lock_bh() with synchronous reclamation, "srcu" for
> + the "srcu_read_lock()" API, and "sched" for the use of
> + preempt_disable() together with synchronize_sched().
>
> verbose Enable debug printk()s. Default is disabled.
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcutorture.c
> index 0f0ff15..e2bda18 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutorture.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutorture.c
> @@ -464,9 +464,47 @@ static struct rcu_torture_ops srcu_ops =
> .name = "srcu"
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Definitions for sched torture testing.
> + */
> +
> +static int sched_torture_read_lock(void)
> +{
> + preempt_disable();
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void sched_torture_read_unlock(int idx)
> +{
> + preempt_enable();
> +}
> +
> +static int sched_torture_completed(void)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void sched_torture_synchronize(void)
> +{
> + synchronize_sched();
> +}
> +
> +static struct rcu_torture_ops sched_ops = {
> + .init = rcu_sync_torture_init,
> + .cleanup = NULL,
> + .readlock = sched_torture_read_lock,
> + .readdelay = rcu_read_delay, /* just reuse rcu's version. */
> + .readunlock = sched_torture_read_unlock,
> + .completed = sched_torture_completed,
> + .deferredfree = rcu_sync_torture_deferred_free,
> + .sync = sched_torture_synchronize,
> + .stats = NULL,
> + .name = "sched"
> +};
> +
> static struct rcu_torture_ops *torture_ops[] =
> { &rcu_ops, &rcu_sync_ops, &rcu_bh_ops, &rcu_bh_sync_ops, &srcu_ops,
> - NULL };
> + &sched_ops, NULL };
>
> /*
> * RCU torture writer kthread. Repeatedly substitutes a new structure
> --
> 1.4.1.1
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists