[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44F78F0D.2030907@student.ltu.se>
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 03:38:21 +0200
From: Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se>
To: Nathan Scott <nathans@....com>
CC: akpm@...l.org, xfs-masters@....sgi.com, xfs@....sgi.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4-mm3 2/2] fs/xfs: Correcting error-prone boolean-statement
Nathan Scott wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:18:31AM +0200, Richard Knutsson wrote:
>
>
>>Nathan Scott wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Are you using XFS on your systems? What is your strategy for getting this
>>>runtime tested going to be? Or are you delegating that responsibility? :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Sorry, can't say that I do. So pretty please... ;)
>>Seriously, I can not find a state when this may fail (if not "if (var ==
>>TRUE)" happend to be correct for 'var' != 0 != 1, but that is just a bug
>>waiting to happend).
>>But please correct me if I am wrong.
>>
>>
>
>OK, I'll run with it in my own testing for awhile.
>
Thanks!
> I was also curious to
>why you didn't remove the other few B_TRUE/B_FALSE occurences? (and the
>typedef)?
>
>
Working on it. Should be out tomorrow(or in about 20 hours).
From the "Re: Conversion to generic boolean"-thread (started on
06-08-28), there were those who did not seem to like the conversion. But
since no-one complained about removing "== B_FALSE/B_TRUE", I thought it
best to remove them first and then take the rest from there.
>cheers.
>
>
>
cu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists