[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060901155407.GC29574@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 17:54:07 +0200
From: Olaf Kirch <okir@...e.de>
To: Chuck Lever <chucklever@...il.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [NFS] [PATCH 019 of 19] knfsd: Register all RPC programs with portmapper by default
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 11:31:25AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> I don't like this. The idea that multiple RPC services are listening
> on the same port is a total hack. What other service might use this
> besides NFSACL?
Why do you consider this a hack? I have always felt that librpc requiring
you to open separate ports for every program you register was a poor
design. The RPC header contains the program number, and the RPC code
is fully capable of demuxing incoming requests. So I do not think it is
a hack at all.
And yes, Solaris NFSACL resides on 2049 too.
Olaf
--
Olaf Kirch | --- o --- Nous sommes du soleil we love when we play
okir@...e.de | / | \ sol.dhoop.naytheet.ah kin.ir.samse.qurax
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists