[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1157133780.18728.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 11:03:00 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
To: schwidefsky@...ibm.com
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.osdl.org, akpm@...l.org,
nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, frankeh@...son.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch 3/9] Guest page hinting: volatile page cache.
On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 19:42 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> The problem of page discard vs. normal page remove is that the page can
> be remove and discarded at the same time. Both sides are writers in the
> sense that they want to remove the page from page cache. RCU doesn't not
> help with that kind of race.
OK. It comes down to a race between
__remove_from_page_cache()/__delete_from_swap_cache()
and
__page_discard()
running on the same page at the same time. Right?
-- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists