[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060901112312.5ff0dd8d.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 11:23:12 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Tom Tucker <tom@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, openib-general@...nib.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1: drivers/infiniband/hw/amso1100/c2.c compile
error
On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:34:24 -0700
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com> wrote:
> Andrew> What's __raw_writeq() supposed to do, anyway? On alpha
> Andrew> it's writeq() without an mb(). On parisc it's writeq()
> Andrew> only the data is byte-reversed. On sparc64() it's
> Andrew> incomprehensible. On everything else it's writeq().
>
> My understanding is that __raw_writeq() is like writeq() except not
> strongly ordered and without the byte-swap on big-endian
> architectures. The __raw_writeX() variants are convenient to avoid
> having to write inefficient code like writel(swab32(foo), ...) when
> talking to a PCI device that wants big-endian data. Without the raw
> variant, you end up with a double swap on big-endian architectures.
>
> sparc64 looks wrong, since __raw_writeq() seems identical to writeq(),
> which seems to imply it's going to swab what is stores.
>
OK. Can we please stop hacking around this in drivers and
a) work out what it's supposed to do
b) document that (Documentation/DocBook/deviceiobook.tmpl or code
comment or whatever)
c) tell arch maintainers?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists