linux-kernel - [patch 0/2] Tmpfs acls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20060901221421.968954146@winden.suse.de>
Date:	Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:14:21 +0200
From:	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Subject: [patch 0/2] Tmpfs acls

This is a refresh of the patches we have to support POSIX ACLs on tmpfs,
with the request for inclusion.

The patches solve the following problem: We want to grant access to
devices based on who is logged in from where, etc. This includes
switching back and forth between multiple user sessions, etc.

Using ACLs to define device access for logged-in users gives us all the
flexibility we need in order to fully solve the problem.

Device special files nowadays usually live on tmpfs, hence tmpfs ACLs.

Different distros have come up with solutions that solve the problem to
different degrees: SUSE uses a resource manager which tracks login
sessions and sets ACLs on device inodes as appropriate. RedHat uses
pam_console, which changes the primary file ownership to the logged-in
user. Others use a set of groups that users must be in in order to be
granted the appropriate accesses.

The freedesktop.org project plans to implement a combination of a
console-tracker and a HAL-device-list based solution to grant access to
devices to users, and more distros will likely follow this approach.

-

These patches have first been posted here on 2 February 2005, and again
on 8 January 2006. We have been shipping them in SLES9 and SLES10 with
no problems reported.  The previous submission is archived here:

   http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/1/8/229
   http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/1/8/230
   http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/1/8/231

Could the patches please get included this time?

Andrew, is putting them in -mm for a while fine with you?

Thanks,
Andreas

--
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>
Novell / SUSE Labs

-- 
VGER BF report: U 0.5
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/