linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/16] GFS2: bmap and inode functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0609020914570.24701@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date:	Sat, 2 Sep 2006 09:16:56 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Russell Cattelan <cattelan@...hat.com>,
	David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] GFS2: bmap and inode functions


>> >+	for (i = ip->i_di.di_height; i--;)
>> >+		mp->mp_list[i] = (__u16)do_div(b, sdp->sd_inptrs);
>> 
>> Drop the cast if possible. do_div returns an integer.
>
>hm, do we need an explicit do_div() in fact, why not just "b / inptrs"?

b is int64 so if we just did b/inptrs, gcc would likely generate calls for 
__udivdi3. Is this udivdi3 dependency satisfied in other code (lib/...?)?

>> How about inverting the if() to:
>> 
>> 	if(ip == NULL)
>> 		return;
>> 	if(test_bit(GLF_DIRTY, &gl->gl_flags))
>> 		gfs_inode_attr_in(ip);
>> 	gfs2_meta_cache_flush(ip);
>
>btw., it should be "if (", not "if(".

There is no such rule in CodingStyle.



Jan Engelhardt
-- 

-- 
VGER BF report: H 0
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/