lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <E1GJzw4-0002ti-00@calista.eckenfels.net> Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 23:55:24 +0200 From: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@...a.inka.de> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: in-kernel rpc.statd In article <Pine.LNX.4.61.0609032255010.6844@...hk01.tjqt.qr> you wrote: > Hm. I do not have a rpc.statd userspace program nor kernel daemon (running > on 2.6.17-vanilla). Yet everything is working. Is there a specific need for > statd? It is more or less an uptime notification protocol for NFS locks. I think NFS clients can recover from a reboot without the help of the statd in most situations. Gruss Bernd -- VGER BF report: H 0.429236 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/