linux-kernel - Re: Raid 0 Swap?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1GK28K-0003wd-00@calista.eckenfels.net>
Date:	Mon, 04 Sep 2006 02:16:12 +0200
From:	Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@...a.inka.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid 0 Swap?

In article <44FB5AAD.7020307@...kel.com> you wrote:
> If I have two drives and I want swap to be fast if I allocate swap spam 
> on both drives does it break up the load between them? Or would it run 
> faster if I did a Raid 0 swap?

if you set up two swap partitions with the same prio, it will distribute the
access, you dont need striping for that. (However with striping you can a
bit better control the stripe size).

Of course you should not plan for swapping, it is just slow...

Gruss
Bernd

-- 
VGER BF report: H 0.224635
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/